<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How useful is Twitter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hkham.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/how-useful-is-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hkham.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/how-useful-is-twitter/</link>
	<description>Media, music, and the life of a young scallywag in Hong Kong</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 05:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian McNitt</title>
		<link>http://hkham.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/how-useful-is-twitter/#comment-3442</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian McNitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hkham.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/how-useful-is-twitter/#comment-3442</guid>
		<description>Twitter wasn't developed as an emergency broadcast or communication system, so I don't think it's fair to hold it to that standard. It just so happens that it allowed a number of people to share their experience about the earthquake in realtime which was an interesting phenomenon. 

I believe the experience got people thinking of new ways to use Twitter and to share information in general. FYI, that screenshot represents about 30 seconds of time. The tinyurl is a link to the shake map you suggest is good information. 

A similar phenomenon happened during 9/11. A number of useful websites with emergency information and resources were posted hours and days before official news sites could catch up. Regardless, I agree with your final assessment. "For people who get kicks out of sharing short, inane messages, Twitter will be a fun way of keeping in touch with friends, family, and respected others. ... Trying to force it to fit a label any grander than that is, at least at this stage, a bit much."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter wasn&#8217;t developed as an emergency broadcast or communication system, so I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s fair to hold it to that standard. It just so happens that it allowed a number of people to share their experience about the earthquake in realtime which was an interesting phenomenon. </p>
<p>I believe the experience got people thinking of new ways to use Twitter and to share information in general. FYI, that screenshot represents about 30 seconds of time. The tinyurl is a link to the shake map you suggest is good information. </p>
<p>A similar phenomenon happened during 9/11. A number of useful websites with emergency information and resources were posted hours and days before official news sites could catch up. Regardless, I agree with your final assessment. &#8220;For people who get kicks out of sharing short, inane messages, Twitter will be a fun way of keeping in touch with friends, family, and respected others. &#8230; Trying to force it to fit a label any grander than that is, at least at this stage, a bit much.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Aristophanes</title>
		<link>http://hkham.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/how-useful-is-twitter/#comment-3436</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Aristophanes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hkham.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/how-useful-is-twitter/#comment-3436</guid>
		<description>Spot on, HKH.

As far as I can see, Twitter's main purpose is to cause Robert Scoble to pound out charmless slabs of breathless yet turgid tech-hackery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on, HKH.</p>
<p>As far as I can see, Twitter&#8217;s main purpose is to cause Robert Scoble to pound out charmless slabs of breathless yet turgid tech-hackery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
